Surprised by US Supreme Court’s abortion pill ruling? You can thank Kansas voters | Opinion
The U.S. Supreme Court likely had no idea of the furor it would unleash when it overturned Roe v. Wade two years ago. You could see the justices take a tentative step backward last week when they unanimously voted to preserve access to the abortion drug mifepristone.
As the ruling was a technical one, based on standing, we can debate whether the justices in the majority actually have changed their opinion on reproductive freedom, but it’s clear that our nation’s top court had second thoughts about pushing the anti-choice agenda further.
For that, the entire nation can thank Kansas.
It can be easy to forget the onetime conventional wisdom about the Kansas ballot measure that would have removed abortion care as a state constitutional right. The Value Them Both amendment had long seen as a shoo-in by supporters. It may have been so if it had appeared on the ballot before the overturning of Roe. Instead, it came to voters on Aug. 2, 2022 — less than two months after the shocking decision.
Even then, the conventional wisdom had shifted only to predicting a close outcome.
But when push comes to shove, the people understood what was at stake. Voters saw that removing the right to choose in Kansas could lead — most probably would lead — to a total abortion ban in the state.
They didn’t want that. They don’t want that. And they will not want that in the future.
The supposedly tight vote instead was a blowout for pro-choice forces. Nearly 60% of Kansas voters rejected the amendment. Some 40% voted for it. That roughly 20 percentage point margin has been one of the most surprising and heartening results in all my years watching Kansas politics.
Other statewide votes followed. Residents of California, Kentucky, Michigan, Vermont and Ohio have all weighed in. More will have an opportunity to do so on election ballots this November. They will have the wind of this latest decision at their backs.
“The Supreme Court affirmed the most basic principle of the American legal system today: Hypothetical scenarios don’t make for actual legal claims,” said Emily Wales, president and CEO of Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains.
“Antiabortion activists tried and failed to block patients from exercising their rights even in states where abortion remains legal,” she continued. “We know this fight isn’t over and that attempts to prevent care and stigmatize patients will continue, but it’s a relief to know that we can continue to provide medication abortion the way it has been offered for years: safely, effectively and without out-of-state activists dictating care here at home.”
I’m not sure exactly what antiabortion rights forces expected to happen after the demise of Roe. For that matter, I’m not sure that the pro-choice forces knew what to expect. Abortion rights had been part of our nation’s settled political landscape for half a century. Both sides probably expected some version of the past to be prologue. That is, the issue would be seen as a roughly 50-50 one, with anti-choice forces holding an edge in voter enthusiasm.
Instead, the exact opposite transpired.
Pro-choice forces racked up a string of political wins beginning here in Kansas. Abortion rights opponents are on their back heels and casting about for a new strategy: At this point, it appears to be attacking abortion rights supporters. That approach hasn’t worked over the past two years, and I’m not sure why they expect it to work now.
Regardless, the Supreme Court surely knew that outlawing or severely curtailing access to mifepristone at this stage would induce an even larger and angrier backlash.
So they swatted down the issue.
In overruling Roe two years ago, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito wrote that “women are not without electoral or political power.”
The good justice, when he’s not living in a home with an upside-down American flag or claiming that one side must emerge victorious from the culture wars, has a point. Women do wield political power. They have shown they know how to use it.
But that shouldn’t obscure the grievous harm done to women and all Americans from ending Roe. It cannot obscure all the work that supporters of reproductive freedom have ahead of them.
Kansas showed the way after Roe v. Wade. But there is still an awfully long path ahead.
Clay Wirestone is opinion editor of the nonprofit Kansas Reflector, where this commentary originally appeared.
